Wednesday, July 30, 2008
I'm Flooded With Rivulets of Thought
In the last 2 weeks I have discovered that somewhat careless flagrance with chip stacks is an amazing way to win a sit-n-go where the players are either tight or are too new to understand when someone is making a move. The good thing about playing at restaurants and bars is that most of the players fall into the 2nd category, about 10% of the players at most tables fall into the first category. The rest are just donkeys and fish that you have to have the patience and a bucket to wait and catch the chips they dump. Last night was not the night for me to do that, so I ended up being the dumper...not the dumpee in relation to the chips.
However, when you use well timed aggression, you can pick up blinds and antes often enough so that when you have a monster, you will get called and you will get more than just the blinds and limpers. It is something I should have seen a long long time ago, but my tight nature wouldn't allow me to use the "Kill Phil" method to win in such a way. There is also the issue that at certain tables you will get called with any naked ace or king that can be played. Cautious aggression may seem like an oxymoron to most, but it definitely applies in this case.
There is no fixed rule...that's where the challenge comes. Sometimes finding the rule of the game you are in leads you to walking away early...sometimes you are the last man standing. Its action...and isn't that what we do this for anyway?
I will be back soon with thoughts on politics, Brett Favre and the upcoming season of football...like the title says...Rivulets of Thought...
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
I Wouldn't Lie To You
Perhaps the best thing you can do for yourself today would be to go to this link:
Dr. Horrible's Sing A Long Blog - Act 1
UPDATE: The site is www.drhorrible.com if you want to visit it again. They just dropped Act II...so check it out as well!
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
WSOP: The Final 9
With that said, it should be no surprise to anyone that poker fans will not recognize the names on the list of the final 9 players who will walk to the final table later this year. With over 6800 people in the Main Event, it was only a matter of about 7 days (more than that actually, but we are going by "tournament days") to weed the pros out and solidify what I would say is a completely unrecognizable table. The yearly donkey fest will give us another unknown to watch try and exist in the new prime time poker that we all love and enjoy since King of the Donks Chris Moneymaker turned $3 Canadian (or some amazing small amount of money as the story goes) into millions because he out-donked 1000 people. If anyone has ever seen the "amazing bluff" he pulled on Sammy Farha to solidify his win, you know that he was walking the very fine line between "Holy crap I can't believe that worked?!?!?" and "Holy crap what a horrible player!!!!" His results since winning show that he was a fluke.
My opinion of the last 5 ME winners isn't very high with a couple exceptions. Joe Hachem has went on to win a WPT event and Greg Raymer has had some good finishes elsewhere, but isn't exactly a solid winner. So with the exception of one and a half winners in the last 5 years, we have seen donkeys take home the once coveted bracelet. Noone can actually defend Jerry Yang or Jamie Gold as real, solid, challenging poker players. I look forward to reading their books so I can learn how to play online freeroll style poker and win millions of dollars. But I digress...I haven't seen the players who are left play, so perhaps the video when ESPN shows it will give me a better picture. The final 9 are:
Dennis Phillips
Ivan Demidov
Scott Montgomery
Peter Eastgate
Ylon Schwartz
Darus Suharto
David Rheem
Craig Marquis
Kelly Kim
So who is the Joe Hachem at the table and will the Jamie Gold or Jerry Yang sitting to his right just scoop his chips and move on to a huge win? Is it a good thing that anyone can win the ME? Do the pro's think it's as big of a challenge as they thought it was years ago OR are they just hoping to win to prove that the donkey boom is at an end?
So many questions...so many donkeys still winning huge tournaments.
A side note, Poker Stars looks to have sealed most of the final table up to endorsement deals. My hope for the delayed final table was that we would see the players actually take longer to make decisions on their endorsements. I semi-supported the move to a delayed final table because it might create situations where we could get behind people, but I have to say if Mike Matusow or Phil Hellmuth were at the final table, I would have an easier time. I guess time will tell and it will come down to the ESPN coverage as to how each person is portrayed on camera.
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Roberts Rules of Poker
A bit of information directly from the rules:
"“Robert's Rules Of Poker” is authored by Robert Ciaffone, better known in the poker world as Bob Ciaffone, a leading authority on cardroom rules. He is the person who has selected which rules to use, and formatted, organized, and worded the text. Nearly all these rules are substantively in common use for poker, but many improved ideas for wording and organization are employed throughout this work. A lot of the rules are similar to those used in the rulebook of cardrooms where he has acted as a rules consultant and rules drafter. Ciaffone authored the rulebook for the Poker Players Association (founded in 1984, now defunct), the first comprehensive set of poker rules for the general public. He has done extensive work on rules for the Las Vegas Hilton, The Mirage, and Hollywood Park Casino, and assisted many other cardrooms. Ciaffone is a regular columnist for Card Player magazine, and can be reached through that publication."
Here is a link to the information:
http://www.lasvegasvegas.com/poker/rules.php
And a handy link to my Google Docs version of it so you can get to it on a mobile device:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dhdw7fmq_6f7jpb4f7
You never know when a situation may arise where this will come in handy!
Friday, July 4, 2008
How To Not Play King-Queen Suited
I have had a complaint about many of the players that I sit with on a weekly basis. They will raise and call raises regardless of position with K-Q. Many times suit doesn't even matter, but God help us all if they get it "sooted". The problem, as I have outlined aloud every time I see it flipped over no matter what the result of the hand was, is that so many hands have this hand dominated! A-K, A-Q, K-K, Q-Q, A-A at least have it beat outright with a few other pairs slightly better statistically. I have a bigger problem with calling out of position, rather than raising, but 7-10 handed, I am not sure I see an instance where raising in a BFP setting is helpful seeing as how any A will follow along. With that said, I decided to play K-Q of hearts a couple weeks ago and filed this hand away to share here.
I am in early position. I limp, as do a couple others. My right raises 3 times the big blind. We are 10 handed so I should fold. Because I was testing out a BFP theory, I call. As well, I had good pot odds at this point to play a suited face card hand. The flop comes J high with 2 hearts. The BB is first to act and was the previous raiser. He throws in 3x the big. Thinking he is continuation betting, I call. Others fold and we are heads up for the turn. Another blank...no heart, no face card. He bets 3x and I call. At this point I made my 3rd mistake. The river comes K. At this point the BB throws in 6x the big letting me know that the entire flop through turn missed him and he is sitting on A-K, thus proving my teachings on K-Q!
I tank for a minute or two, call his hand A-K suited and fold. He shows me A-K of diamonds. Here were my mistakes:
- I should have folded preflop. No doubt, no question! The raise could have been a position raise or could have been a situation where he had me dominated. I ignored the first option and called.
- On the flop I started chasing in an incorrect manner. I believe if I bet my draw here and raise the BB, he might fold. He admitted that me might have called depending on the bet.
- On the turn I again did not raise. I am positive if I raise here I get the pot. Instead I called and made myself have to think about the river.
- Here is the worst case scenario with a hand like K-Q. I hit my K! I have a good kicker. Is he stealing? I correctly called his hand and made the correct read, but if I had thought about each step as closely as I considered the river, I wouldn't have had to think about it at this point and would have saved myself chips.
So many people blog about how they dominated someone else or how they took the worst beat ever. I wanted to break that trend and tell you how I messed up. I make these mistakes often enough to bother me. Hopefully, by giving you this situation, you can make that read earlier and save some chips and some face when you flip over a bad hand to show your idiocy.
Vacation
This week I have been on vacation. Because Amanda and I are traveling this weekend to VA, I decided to take a 9 day weekend and catch up on some stuff. With the recent job change...did I mention that?...I needed to clean the house, look at some homes and just do ernie stuff. It has been a good week for that. We spent most days quite busy. I am writing from the Holiday Inn Express in Pounding Mill, VA. Luckily, there is a Walmart near...a Wendy's and free wireless internet. While Amanda works on wedding things with her friends and such, I look to play some online poker and enjoy my real free time. I may even hit the pool shortly.
Happy 4th to you all!
